<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Privacy on Fix The Supreme Court</title>
    <link>/tags/privacy/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Privacy on Fix The Supreme Court</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.148.2</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 22:32:20 -0400</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="/tags/privacy/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>The Court Got One Right: Geofence Warrants Are Now a Fourth Amendment Search</title>
      <link>/posts/chatrie-geofence-warrants/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 09:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <guid>/posts/chatrie-geofence-warrants/</guid>
      <description>In Chatrie v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that police need a real warrant before pulling everyone&amp;#39;s location data near a crime scene. It&amp;#39;s a genuine privacy win — and Alito&amp;#39;s dissent shows how close it came to going the other way.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
